For me, some person tends to be interesting if we are able to argue (in meaning "dispute") with each other.
So, two consequences go out from this:
1. This person able to argue quite well-reasoned.
2. This person has different point of view on particular problem.
From it we have, that, first of all, we should have similar problems/ideas been interesting for both of us. Secondly, we should both be at nearly one level of acknoledgement of themes we are discussing, because we must skip obvious aspects of it and focus on ambiguos questions.
That way, discussion will always be interesting for us and one side could protect it's point of view, the other side could refuse it's point of view or vice reverse or any other possible variation.
And, if after our argues, we will still be friends, then it's ideal possibiity to make a new good friend.
So, two consequences go out from this:
1. This person able to argue quite well-reasoned.
2. This person has different point of view on particular problem.
From it we have, that, first of all, we should have similar problems/ideas been interesting for both of us. Secondly, we should both be at nearly one level of acknoledgement of themes we are discussing, because we must skip obvious aspects of it and focus on ambiguos questions.
That way, discussion will always be interesting for us and one side could protect it's point of view, the other side could refuse it's point of view or vice reverse or any other possible variation.
And, if after our argues, we will still be friends, then it's ideal possibiity to make a new good friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment